MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415681075 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113897

Unveiling DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 as crucial chaperones in hepatitis B and D virus particle morphogenesis

2025· article· en· W4415681075 on OpenAlexafffund
Léna Angelo, Richard Boulon, Patrick Labonté

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArmand-Frappier Foundation
KeywordsMorphogenesisHepatitis B virusGene knockdownHBsAgSecretionTransmembrane proteinHepadnaviridae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During chronic HBV infection, the massive secretion of HBV envelope proteins (HBsAg) as non-infectious subviral particles (SVPs) remains a significant challenge in achieving a functional cure. Despite this, the HBsAg folding process, essential for HBV and HDV particle morphogenesis, remains poorly understood. DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 are two recently identified co-chaperones implicated in transmembrane protein folding. Utilizing the nucleic acid polymer REP 2139 as a bait, we identified DNAJB12 as a REP 2139 interactor, and its knockdown impedes the morphogenesis and secretion of SVP and HBV virions. Conversely, DNAJB14, which did not interact with REP 2139, selectively impaired the morphogenesis of virions. Additionally, knockdowns of DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 hindered the production of infectious HDV. As DNAJB12 knockdown recapitulated REP 2139 antiviral effects observed in clinical trials, our findings highlight DNAJB12 as the potential primary target of REP 2139 and uncover functional roles for DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 in HBV and HDV life cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207