MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415683067 · doi:10.4236/jbm.2025.1310032

C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Marker in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· W4415683067 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yingzi Wang, Binhao Zhang, Yao Liu, Yibo Yu, Zhaoyin Su, Yatao Liu, Nerlich Michael

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biosciences and Medicines · 2025
Typereview
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training ProgramLanzhou University
KeywordsObservational studyOdds ratioMeta-analysisCochrane LibraryConfidence intervalBiomarkerPublication biasC-reactive proteinFunnel plot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating subtype of stroke with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Inflammation is a key driver of secondary brain injury following ICH, and C-reactive protein (CRP) is a cardinal biomarker of systemic inflammation. While numerous studies have investigated the prognostic role of CRP in ICH, its utility remains a subject of debate, with conflicting findings across the literature. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence and quantitatively assess the association between CRP levels and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with spontaneous ICH. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2026. We included observational studies that evaluated the association between CRP levels and subsequent poor outcomes in adult patients with spontaneous ICH. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Common and Random effects models were used to pool odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots. Results: A total of 15 observational studies involving 14,285 patients met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative assessment indicated that most studies were of moderate to high quality. The meta-analysis revealed that elevated CRP levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of poor outcome (pooled OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.51, p 2 = 90.3%). Similarly, high CRP levels were a significant predictor of poor functional outcome (pooled OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04 - 1.35, p 2 = 84.3%) and mortality (pooled OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08 - 2.12, p 2 = 84.3%). High CRP levels were a significant predictor of early hematoma growth (pooled OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.17, p 2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the primary findings. There was no evidence of significant publication bias. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides strong evidence that elevated CRP levels are independently associated with a higher risk of poor outcome in patients with spontaneous ICH. CRP is an accessible, inexpensive, and valuable biomarker that can aid in early risk stratification and may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted anti-inflammatory therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biosciences and MedicinesSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207