MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415683819 · doi:10.3390/axioms14110792

Derivation of a Closed-Form Asymptotic Variance for the Coefficient of Variation Under the Reparameterized Birnbaum–Saunders Distribution

2025· article· en· W4415683819 on OpenAlexaff
Tossapol Phoophiwfa, Piyapatr Busababodhin, Andrei Volodin, Sujitta Suraphee

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersMahasarakham UniversityAgricultural Research Development Agency
KeywordsEstimatorDelta methodVariance (accounting)Asymptotic distributionConvergence (economics)Expression (computer science)Monte Carlo methodNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study develops a tractable, closed-form expression for the asymptotic variance of the coefficient of variation (CV) estimator under a reparameterized Birnbaum–Saunders (BirSau) distribution. Using the method of moments, we derive analytical formulas for the mean, variance, and coefficient of variation of X∼BirSau(μ,λ) and construct a plug-in estimator for the CV. By applying the delta method within this new nonlinear parametrization, we obtain an explicit and compact expression for the asymptotic variance of the CV estimator, thereby extending general asymptotic theory to a distribution-specific setting where higher-order moments lack closed forms under the classical parametrization. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to examine the estimator’s finite-sample performance under various parameter configurations and sample sizes. The results demonstrate that the estimator exhibits decreasing bias and variance as the sample size increases, with strong convergence to its theoretical asymptotic behavior. A real-data application using rainfall measurements from northeastern Thailand further illustrates the practical utility of the proposed approach in quantifying relative variability across regions. These findings provide a concise analytical foundation for the coefficient of variation under the Birnbaum–Saunders framework, enhancing its theoretical development and facilitating practical implementation in environmental and reliability analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207