MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415683829 · doi:10.3390/axioms14110784

The Law of the Iterated Logarithm for the Error Distribution Estimator in First-Order Autoregressive Models

2025· article· en· W4415683829 on OpenAlexaff
Bing Wang, Yi Jin, Lina Wang, Xiaoping Shi, Wenzhi Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEstimatorLaw of the iterated logarithmAutoregressive modelKernel smootherAsymptotic distributionKernel (algebra)STAR modelIterated logarithmLogarithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the asymptotic behavior of kernel-based estimators for the error distribution in a first-order autoregressive model with dependent errors. The model assumes that the error terms form an α-mixing sequence with an unknown cumulative distribution function (CDF) and finite second moment. Due to the unobservability of true errors, we construct kernel-smoothed estimators based on residuals obtained via least squares. Under mild assumptions on the kernel function, bandwidth selection, and mixing coefficients, we establish a logarithmic law of the iterated logarithm (LIL) for the supremum norm difference between the residual-based kernel estimator and the true distribution function. The limiting bound is shown to be 1/2, matching the classical LIL for independent samples. To support the theoretical results, simulation studies are conducted to compare the empirical and kernel distribution estimators under various sample sizes and error term distributions. The kernel estimators demonstrate smoother convergence behavior and improved finite-sample performance. These results contribute to the theoretical foundation for nonparametric inference in autoregressive models with dependent errors and highlight the advantages of kernel smoothing in distribution function estimation under dependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207