MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415684645 · doi:10.1002/pan3.70177

The birds and the trees: Avian ecosystem (dis)service perspectives and farmers' willingness to plant native trees in the agricultural landscape of the Galapagos Islands

2025· article· en· W4415684645 on OpenAlexafffund
Ilke Geladi, Jiaying Zhao, Birgit Feßl, Sandra García, Claire Kremen

Bibliographic record

VenuePeople and Nature · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnimal and Plant Science Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundación Charles Darwin
KeywordsEcosystem servicesAgricultureBiodiversityTree plantingWoodlandBird conservationNative plant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Agricultural landscapes hold great potential for biodiversity conservation; however, this will require finding solutions that work for both people and nature. Increasingly, the conservation community is calling for more cross‐disciplinary research integrating ecological questions with social and behavioural sciences for a more complete and successful approach to conservation. Here, we used a mixed methods approach, including 53 in‐person interviews, to examine how small‐scale farmers in the Galapagos Islands perceive landbirds and their ecosystem (dis)services. We also studied farmers' motivations and hesitations in planting native trees on their farms, an action that was identified to be critical for landbird conservation in Galapagos in previous ecological studies. We found that all native landbirds provided important cultural ecosystem services (CES) to farmers, with some variation between species. We also found that perceptions around pest control and pollination services were more variable and that landbirds were generally highly liked, even those who provided disservices such as crop damage. Most farmers were willing to plant native and endemic trees on their farms, although typically only in small quantities. Farmers' main motivations for planting trees were instrumental (e.g. shade/freshness), while their primary hesitation was a perceived lack of space on their farms. The main predictor of willingness was the prior presence of native trees on their farm. Synthesis and applications : Our results suggest tree‐planting conservation efforts should be adaptive, context‐dependent, and leverage incentives and community events for farmers. As a starting point, we recommend working with larger farms and with farmers interested in agrotourism for farmland restoration, recognizing that birdwatching has untapped potential in Galapagos. We further suggest focusing conservation messaging for the local community on the CES we identify for specific Galapagos landbirds, since CES are linked to people's motivations to care for nature. Finally, more research is needed to explore what ‘Galapagos identity’ means since we found it to be associated with farmers' landbird perspectives and willingness to plant trees, and self‐identity can drive pro‐environmental behaviours. We also recommend more research to understand the pest control services landbirds may be providing, if any, in the agricultural zone. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeople and NatureSame topicAnimal and Plant Science EducationFrench-language works237,207