Metal contamination and radiological risk assessment in the coastal zone of Wadi Ghadir outlet, Red Sea, Egypt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated concentrations, spatial distribution, and ecological–health risks of nine heavy metals in 25 surface sediment samples from Wadi Ghadir outlet, southeastern Red Sea coast, Egypt. The sediments were sandy (>94%), alkaline (pH 8.12), and contained moderate organic matter (5.6%–8.9%). Metal concentrations (mg/kg) followed: Fe > Ba > Cr > Zn > Ni > V > Pb > Cu > Co. Ba, Cr, and Ni exceeded Canadian soil quality guidelines and global Earth crust backgrounds, while others remained below. Spatially, Ba, Ni, and V peaked in the north, Co, Cr, and Zn in central sites, and Pb, Cu, and Fe in the south. Multivariate analyses indicated both natural and anthropogenic sources. Enrichment and contamination factors showed moderate enrichment for Pb and Ni, and considerable contamination for Ni. Geo-accumulation index (I geo >5) and pollution load index (PLI; 1.62) confirmed significant contamination. Ecological risk indices (PERI <150, Er i <40) suggested overall low risk, with Ni and Pb most concerned. Additional sediment quality indices (MERMQ, TRI, mHQ) pointed to medium–moderate ecological and toxic risks, while human health evaluation revealed low non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks. Radiological analyses of 232 Th, 40 K, and 226 Ra revealed concentrations (Bq/Kg) and dose indices within global safety limits, indicating negligible radiological risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".