MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415690471 · doi:10.1002/vrc2.70202

Osteoblastic metastasis secondary to mammary carcinoma in a dog ( <i>Canis lupus familiaris</i> ) presenting with lameness

2025· article· en· W4415690471 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Sheehan, Benoît Cuq, Conor Moloney, Sèamus Hoey, Oliver Waite, Hanne Jahns

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamenessMedullary cavityMetastasisLumbarLumbar vertebraeThoracic vertebraeMedullaHyperostosisLymph node

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Osteoblastic metastases occur secondary to malignant epithelial tumours, and lead to marked periosteal hyperostosis and medullary sclerosis. These are rarely reported in dogs. A 7‐year‐old, neutered, female labrador retriever × standard poodle presented with a 4‐week history of progressive right hindlimb lameness, pyrexia and thoracolumbar pain. A mammary mass was identified, with cytology indicating a malignant carcinoma. Computed tomography demonstrated extensive primary osteoblastic lesions affecting vertebrae and proximal appendicular bones, alongside pulmonary and lymph node metastasis. Given the guarded prognosis, euthanasia was elected by the owner. Postmortem examination revealed irregular periosteal proliferation associated with metastatic mammary carcinoma in the scapula, humerus, femur, ribs, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and bony induration of the medulla of the long bones. This case advances the understanding of skeletal metastases in dogs, which can often be misdiagnosed, and offers guidance for clinical and diagnostic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207