A Trait Syndrome Ties Cell Morphology to Glycolysis Across the Yeast Subphylum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Co-variation of traits provides fundamental insights into constraints governing their evolution. An inverse correlation between glucose uptake rates (GURs) and cell surface area-to-volume (SA:V) ratios across 11 yeast species was recently reported. Here, we expand the analysis to 282 species to assess the generalizability of this correlation across Saccharomycotina yeasts and the contribution of shared evolutionary history to the co-variation of these traits. Using phylogenetic regression models, we found extracellular acidification rates (ECARs, used as a proxy for GURs) were weakly, but significantly, correlated with SA:V across Saccharomycotina. ECARs were also correlated with genome sizes and growth rates. Our findings support the reported correlation between GURs and SA:V ratios, but suggest other associated traits, including genome sizes. Specifically, yeasts that consume glucose faster tend to have lower SA:V, faster growth rates, and larger genomes, suggesting a trait syndrome governing several metabolic, genomic, and morphological traits across the yeast subphylum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".