MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415697931 · doi:10.1016/j.prps.2025.09.001

L’indépendance à tout prix : une analyse phénoménologique interprétative d’entretiens narratifs de jeunes survivants à long terme de cancer pédiatrique

2025· article· fr· W4415697931 on OpenAlexafffund
Camille Bourdeau, Andy Charbonneau, Carole Provost, Émélie Rondeau, Caroline Laverdière, Roxane de la Sablonnière, Serge Sultan

Bibliographic record

VenuePratiques Psychologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de MontréalCégep Marie-Victorin
FundersCole Foundation
KeywordsAlcoholics AnonymousAlcohol consumptionSocial environment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les jeunes survivants à long terme de cancer pédiatrique doivent composer avec le développement de leur autonomie, un défi associé au début de l’âge adulte. Alors que la recherche et la théorie montrent que l’environnement social influence ce processus, nous en savons peu sur le rôle de l’expérience de cancer dans celui-ci. Cette étude consiste en une seconde analyse d’entretiens menés auprès de jeunes survivants de leucémie pédiatrique, en portant attention à la question de la dépendance-indépendance à leurs parents. Comprendre l’expérience de l’indépendance chez 12 survivants à long terme de leucémie pédiatrique et ses implications sur le fonctionnement individuel. Douze jeunes adultes survivants de cancer pédiatrique (9 femmes, M âge = 22 ans, Min = 18 ans ; Max = 27 ans) ont été recrutés via la clinique de suivi à long terme d’un centre de traitement du cancer en Amérique du Nord. Des entretiens narratifs (McAdams, 2007) ont été menés et analysés dans le cadre d’une analyse phénoménologique interprétative (Smith et al., 2022). Deux thèmes expérientiels de groupe ont émergé : (1) L’indépendance vécue comme un idéal en réaction à la vulnérabilité caractéristique de la trajectoire de cancer et (2) La quête de l’indépendance motivée par de multiples expériences relationnelles dysfonctionnelles avec les figures centrales d’attachement. Les résultats suggèrent que la quête d’indépendance a des coûts importants dans la sphère sociale sur le long terme. Les résultats montrent que les dynamiques d’indépendance doivent être prises en compte par les équipes soignantes dès la phase de traitement afin d’optimiser la santé psychique à long terme des survivants. Young, long-term survivors of childhood cancer face the challenge of developing the independence associated with early adulthood. While research and theory indicate that the social environment influences this process, little is known about the role of the cancer experience in this regard. This study consists of a second analysis of interviews conducted with young survivors of childhood leukemia, paying attention to the issue of dependency-independence towards their parents. To understand the experience of independence in 12 long-term survivors of childhood leukemia and its impact on individual functioning. Twelve young adult survivors of pediatric cancer (9 females, M age = 22 years, Min = 18 years; Max = 27 years) were recruited through the long-term follow-up clinic of a cancer treatment center in North America. Narrative interviews (McAdams, 2007) were conducted and analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis (Smith et al., 2022). Two group experiential themes emerged: (1) Independence experienced as an ideal in response to the vulnerability characteristic of the cancer trajectory, and (2) The quest for independence motivated by multiple dysfunctional relational experiences with central attachment figures. Results suggest that the pursuit of independence has significant long-term social costs. The results show that the dynamics of independence need to be considered by care teams from the treatment phase onwards to optimise survivors’ long-term psychological health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePratiques PsychologiquesSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207