MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415699678 · doi:10.1123/japa.2025-0041

Effects of Chair-Based Exercises on Perceived Therapeutic and Quality of Life in Inactive Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4415699678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Osman Bayazıt, Volkan AŞKUN

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aging and Physical Activity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Physical activityPublic healthSocial supportHealth careMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of chair-based exercises (CBEs) on pain, function, balance, quality of life, and exercise perception in inactive older adults with knee osteoarthritis and explored social policy implications. METHODS: A single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, included 40 participants (≥65 years, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-3 knee osteoarthritis, and no regular exercise in the last 3 months). The intervention group (IG; n = 20) performed CBE twice weekly for 8 weeks, while the control group (n = 20) maintained usual activities. Outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (pain, stiffness, and function), Timed Up-and-Go test (balance/mobility), Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, and Nottingham Health Profile. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance to compare postintervention outcomes while controlling for baseline scores, and qualitative comparative analysis explored factors affecting quality of life. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance revealed that the IG demonstrated statistically significant and clinically substantial improvements in pain, stiffness, and function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis), as well as dynamic balance and mobility (Timed Up and Go), with large treatment effects observed across all measures compared with the control group. Perceived exercise benefits increased, and barriers decreased in the IG. Nottingham Health Profile scores also improved significantly in the IG. Qualitative comparative analysis indicated that quality-of-life improvements resulted from pain reduction, functional gains, and enhanced exercise perception. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that an 8-week CBE program significantly improves pain, function, balance, and quality of life in older adults with knee osteoarthritis while enhancing exercise motivation. SIGNIFICANCE: As a cost-effective and safe intervention, CBE can support active aging, reduce health care costs, and enhance older adults' social participation. Integrating CBE into public health policies and community programs may promote well-being and independence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aging and Physical ActivitySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207