Rapid and late cosmic reionization driven by massive galaxies: a joint analysis of constraints from 21-cm, Lyman line, and CMB data sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Observations of the Epoch of Reionization have the potential to answer long-standing questions of astrophysical interest regarding the nature of the first luminous sources and their effects on the intergalactic medium (IGM). We present astrophysical constraints from a Neural Density Estimation-Accelerated Bayesian joint analysis of constraints deriving from cosmic microwave background power spectrum measurements from Planck and South Pole Telescope, IGM neutral fraction measurements from Lyman line-based data sets, and 21-cm power spectrum upper limits from Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array, LOw Frequency ARray, and the Murchison Widefield Array. In the context of the model employed, the data are found to be consistent with galaxies forming from predominantly atomic-cooled hydrogen gas in dark matter haloes, with masses $M_\mathrm{h} \gtrsim 2.6 \times 10^{9}~{\rm M}_{\odot } ((1+z)/10)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ at 95 per cent credibility ($V_\mathrm{c} \gtrsim 50~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}}$) being the dominant galactic population driving reionization. These galaxies reionize the neutral hydrogen in the IGM over a narrow redshift interval ($\Delta z_\mathrm{re} < 1.8$ at 95 per cent credibility), with the mid-point of reionization constrained to $z_{50} = 7.16^{+0.15}_{-0.12}$. We also obtain a tight constraint on the optical depth to reionization, $\tau _{\mathrm{CMB}} = 0.052 \pm 0.002$, disfavouring high-$\tau _\mathrm{CMB}$ scenarios ($\tau _{\mathrm{CMB}} \sim 0.09$) proposed to ease Planck–Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument tensions. Given the parameter posteriors from our joint analysis, we find that the posterior predictive distribution of the global 21-cm signal is reduced in amplitude and shifted to lower redshifts relative to the model prior. We caution, however, that our inferences are model-dependent. Future work incorporating updated mass-dependent star formation efficiencies in atomic cooling haloes, informed by the latest UV luminosity function constraints from the James Webb Space Telescope, promises to refine these inferences further and enhance our understanding of cosmic reionization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".