Longitudinal Characterization of Males With X-Linked Creatine Transporter Deficiency: Final Results of a Multiyear Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Vigilan observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02931682) was to prospectively assess the natural history and developmental course of creatine transporter deficiency (CTD). METHODS: Males with CTD aged 6 months to 65 years were evaluated at 6-month intervals for up to 4 years. Evaluations included neurodevelopmental assessments of intellectual functioning, adaptive functioning, challenging behaviors and the onset and progression of medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Fifty participants (median age, 7.6 years) were enrolled. The predominant CTD phenotype consisted of significant intellectual disabilities and limited skill development over time. Most participants had a history of febrile or nonfebrile seizures, gastrointestinal symptoms, and growth failure. All participants learned how to walk, 78% developed at least some verbal speech, and 34% communicated using phrases or sentences. Norm-referenced neurodevelopment assessments indicated declining standardized scores over time; however, absolute scores (i.e., age equivalent person ability scores) indicated that developmental gains were slower than average, particularly among older participants. Between-person differences in neurodevelopmental skills as a function of age did not match within-person change, suggesting a cohort effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, CTD was associated with significant and persistent intellectual disability. The use of absolute metrics from neurodevelopmental tests (e.g., person ability scores) allowed for the quantification of slow, but present, skill development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".