MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415706383 · doi:10.1159/000549276

A Systematic Review of the Effects of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists on Pancreatic Islets

2025· review· en· W4415706383 on OpenAlexaff
Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Ellen Yang, Christine E. Dri, Joshua D. Rosenblat, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Roger S. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrain and Cognition Discovery FoundationUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlpha cellPancreatic isletsReceptorNMDA receptorAntagonismAntidepressantAntagonistBeta cellFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are widely distributed in the brain and pancreas. Preliminary evidence indicates that aberrant NMDAR-mediated glutamatergic signaling may disrupt pancreatic islet function and glucose-insulin homeostasis. The frequent comorbidity of depression and diabetes underscores the potential role of NMDAR signaling in pancreatic function as a shared pathophysiological mechanism. Herein, this systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of NMDAR antagonism on pancreatic cells (i.e., alpha, beta, delta) viability and function (i.e., activation, hormone production, and release). METHODS: We performed a systematic search on PubMed and Ovid databases from inception to September 11, 2024. A manual search was also conducted on Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Eligible studies were primary, controlled in vitro or in vivo studies investigating the effects of NMDAR antagonism on pancreatic islet function and viability. Results were synthesized and presented descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two reviewers using a modified SYRCLE risk of bias tool. RESULTS: We reviewed 14 studies evaluating NMDA receptor antagonism in whole islets, beta and alpha cells; however, no studies evaluated delta cells. Within beta cells, NMDAR antagonism improved glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and increased cell proliferation and viability. Similarly, alpha cells were protected against stress-induced apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that NMDAR antagonism improves alpha and beta cell function and viability, which may have translational relevance to comorbid metabolic dysfunction in depression. These mechanisms may subserve the antidepressant effects of select NMDA antagonists (e.g., ketamine/esketamine, dextromethorphan). Further research should aim to investigate the effects of subanesthetic doses of ketamine/esketamine on pancreatic function and on delta cells. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.006
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207