MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415707275 · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06005-5

A Video Dataset for Nearshore Wave Breaking Type Classification

2025· article· en· W4415707275 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Yin, Feng Cai, Hongshuai Qi, Jixiang Zheng, Bipeng Hui, Xinda Wu, Kai Liu, Xi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBreaking waveWorkflowBreaking strengthLimitingDissipationFrame (networking)Wave height

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wave breaking type is a fundamental indicator of nearshore hydrodynamic processes, directly reflecting wave energy dissipation mechanisms. With the advancement of shore-based video monitoring, remote sensing has emerged as an efficient tool for identifying wave breaking types. However, existing studies predominantly rely on static single-frame imagery, limiting the ability to capture the dynamic evolution of breaking events. In this work, we present the first publicly available video dataset dedicated to wave breaking type classification. The dataset comprises 9,000 labeled wave breaking clips collected from 15 cameras across six morphologically diverse coastal sites, encompassing three primary breaking types: Spilling, Plunging, and Surging. To enhance the dataset's quality and consistency, a rigorous data curation workflow was implemented, including video segmentation, cropping, labeling, and frame extraction. Classification experiments using a well-established deep learning architecture combing CNN and RNN achieved state-of-the-art performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207