MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415707387 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2025.3627524

A Hyperbolic Secant-Based Pulse for Enhanced FTN Signaling in 5G/6G Systems

2025· article· W4415707387 on OpenAlexaff
Yaakoub Berrouche, Michel Kulhandjian, Hovannes Kulhandjian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse shapingRobustness (evolution)Pulse compressionSpectral efficiencyPulse (music)Hyperbolic functionInterference (communication)Signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates pulse shaping optimization in faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling to enhance spectral efficiency and reduce inter-symbol interference (ISI). We propose a novel hyperbolic secant root-raised cosine (HS-RRC) pulse, obtained by multiplying the conventional RRC pulse with a hyperbolic secant function. The HS-RRC pulse exhibits improved time localization, reduced ISI, and enhanced bit-error-rate (BER) performance. Extensive simulations show that, compared to the standard RRC pulse, the HS-RRC achieves notable gains in time-bandwidth product and BER across various roll-off factors. Unlike prior hyperbolic-based approaches tyrovolas2022novel, our multiplicative shaping method offers both improved spectral containment and implementation simplicity. For selected temporal compression factors (τ), the HS-RRC achieves up to a 4 dB SNR improvement at τ=0.5 and 2 dB at τ=0.8, at BER levels of 10-1 and 10-4. These enhancements significantly boost system performance, demonstrating the pulse’s ability to reduce ISI and improve system robustness under varying compression conditions, with promising applications for next-generation 5G/6G networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207