MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415709757 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334590

Watt-level high-OSNR continuous wave tunable figure-8 holmium-doped fiber laser for OWC systems

2025· article· en· W4415709757 on OpenAlexaff
Ammar Armghan, Ahmad Atieh, Khaled Aliqab, Meshari Alsharari, Jawad Mirza, Slim Chaoui, Muhammad Ijaz

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsOptiwave Systems (Canada)
FundersAl Jouf University
KeywordsLasing thresholdLaser linewidthWavelengthContinuous waveLaserTransmission (telecommunications)Slope efficiencyFiber laserCoupling (piping)Single-mode optical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2000 nm optical transmission window is gaining significant interest for terrestrial and deep-space optical wireless communication (OWC) due to its exceptionally low atmospheric absorption. Therefore, high-power Holmium-doped fiber lasers (HDFLs) with high optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) are attractive solutions for OWC systems because they can enhance transmission efficiency, improve signal quality over longer transmission distances, and ensure reliable communication in challenging atmospheric conditions by operating in the eye-safe 2000 nm wavelength range. In this work, we propose the design of a watt-level, high-OSNR continuous wave (CW) HDFL tunable in 2022-2140 nm wavelength range based on figure-8 (F8) cavity and a single in-band backward pump source. The performance of F8 HDFL is evaluated considering optimized pumping configuration, length of Holmium-doped fiber (HDF), and Ho3+ ions density. Maximum output powers of 0.842 W, 1.5 W, and 2 W are obtained at lasing wavelength of 2046.7 nm for 20%, 40%, and 60% of coupling ratios, respectively. Highest slope efficiency (SE) of 51.8% is achieved at 2046.7 nm for 60% of coupling ratio considering optimized parameters. OSNR and linewidth (LW) in the range of 30.4-93.3 dB and 18.5-19.9 MHz, respectively are obtained when laser is tuned in 2022-2140 nm wavelength range. A power fluctuation around 0.3 dB at lasing wavelengths of 2022 nm and 2100 nm for fifteen iterations, each taken at five-minute interval is observed for 20% coupling ratio. Finally, the effect of pair induced quenching (PIQ) at laser's output power is analyzed. A negligible penalty of around 7 mW is observed in output power of the laser at 2046.7 nm for 20% coupling ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207