MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415710331 · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18085

Seizing Growth Opportunities: A Risky Business? Effects of Cloud Sourcing on Mergers and Acquisitions

2025· article· en· W4415710331 on OpenAlexaff
Moksh Matta, Hyeokkoo Eric Kwon, Kiron Ravindran, Gautam Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueMIS Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingTransaction costViewpointsMergers and acquisitionsSoftware as a serviceOutsourcingFlexibility (engineering)Insourcing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has shown that enterprise information technology (IT) can drive strategic growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&As). An implicit assumption underlying this research is that firms own their IT infrastructure. Challenging this assumption, however, the emerging trend of cloud sourcing suggests that IT may be owned by third-party vendors. Since third-party ownership of IT can introduce significant transaction costs and operational inefficiencies, cloud sourcing, unlike in-house enterprise IT, may be considered unlikely to drive M&A growth. However, the unique combination of IT infrastructural and service flexibilities that cloud sourcing provides could help in reducing the risk of integration failure posed by M&As, thereby driving M&A growth. Grounded in the transaction cost economics and resource-based views of the firm, respectively, these arguments illustrate the conflicting theoretical viewpoints offered by prior literature. This study seeks to improve our theoretical understanding of the relationship between cloud sourcing and M&A growth by addressing the theoretical conflict. Analyzing a dataset of cloud sourcing deals and M&As comprising 4,075 observations from 673 firms, our research finds that highly standardized cloud services, i.e., SaaS (software as a service), public, and globalized clouds, have a positive impact on M&As, particularly in information industries. Overall, these results indicate that it is only under conditions of enhanced flexibility afforded by a standardized platform and informationally rich operating environments that cloud sourcing positively affects M&A growth. Support for the theoretical propositions is further established through interviews with industry experts and mechanism tests, which reveal that cloud sourcing has a positive impact, specifically on M&As requiring intensive integration, and is associated with reduced disclosure of M&A risks in annual reports. Finally, consistent with our view that cloud sourcing smooths post-M&A integration, this research also finds that firms with cloud sourcing have relatively stronger post-M&A performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMIS QuarterlySame topicOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207