MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415711778 · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100929

Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 3, Randomized EVOKE-01 Trial

2025· article· en· W4415711778 on OpenAlexaff
Niels Reinmuth, S. Couraud, Luis Paz‐Ares, Marina Chiara Garassino, Shobhit Baijal, Davey B. Daniel, Pilar Garrido, Terufumi Kato, Ivor Percent, Achim Rittmeyer, Hector Soto Parra, Sabeen Mekan, Mira Patel, M. Radford, Éric Zhang, C. Pelligra, Shien Guo, Enriqueta Felip

Bibliographic record

VenueJTO Clinical and Research Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsZymeworks (Canada)
FundersGilead UK and Ireland Corporate ContributionsGilead Sciences
KeywordsDocetaxelQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialPhases of clinical researchChemotherapyExploratory analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In the phase 3 EVOKE-01 trial (NCT05089734), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) exhibited a numerical improvement in overall survival and tolerability compared with docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitors, although results were not statistically significant. This analysis evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from EVOKE-01. Methods: Patients (N = 603) were randomized 1:1 to SG (n = 299) or docetaxel (n = 304) in 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed by the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level questionnaire. Least square mean changes from baseline at week 25, time to first meaningful deterioration or death, and time to confirmed deterioration were analyzed. Results: SG exhibited significantly and meaningfully better effects than docetaxel on NSCLC-SAQ shortness of breath (SoB), fatigue, total score, and on QLQ-C30 role functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea. Time to first meaningful deterioration or death favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval ]: 0.75 [0.61-0.91]), fatigue (0.70 [0.57-0.86]), and total score (0.80 [0.66-0.97]); QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.80 [0.66-0.96]) and dyspnea (0.74 [0.60-0.90]); and EuroQol visual analog scale (0.79 [0.65-0.96]). The time to confirmed deterioration favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (0.59 [0.44-0.77]) and fatigue (0.70 [0.52-0.95]), and QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.75 [0.59-0.95]). Conclusions: These exploratory results suggest that SG may benefit HRQoL over docetaxel, supporting SG as an active therapeutic agent for metastatic NSCLC post platinum-based and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitor therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTO Clinical and Research ReportsSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207