MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415711887 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107591

Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers of Adherence to Mediterranean-Ketogenic Dietary Interventions in Parkinson’s Disease: A Qualitative Study

2025· article· en· W4415711887 on OpenAlexafffund
Kira Tosefsky, Yolanda N. Wang, Joyce S. T. Lam, Tamara R. Cohen, Silke Appel‐Cresswell

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchParkinson CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaWeston Family Foundation
KeywordsQualitative researchPsychological interventionFocus groupQualitative analysisContext (archaeology)MEDLINEIntervention (counseling)Clinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Emerging research suggests indications for both Mediterranean and ketogenic diets in Parkinson's disease (PD), with hybrid Mediterranean-ketogenic interventions potentially conferring maximal benefit. However, the acceptability of these interventions in individuals with PD (PwPs) remains to be established. Objectives: To explore and compare factors affecting PwPs' experiences with and adherence to an 8-wk Mediterranean-ketogenic (MeDi-KD) versus an 8-wk medium-chain triglyceride (MCT)-supplemented Mediterranean (MeDi-MCT) diet. Methods: Forty-eight PwPs took part in ≥1 phase of the crossover trial. Sixty-seven semistructured interviews were completed by 44 participants after each intervention. Interview questions, structured using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), explored how participant attitudes, control beliefs, environmental contexts, and social influences impacted study diet adherence. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Results: Two subthemes each emerged under of the overall themes of "Attitudes," "Perceived behavioral control," and "Subjective norms" within the TPB framework. Attitudes toward MeDi-KD and MeDi-MCT compositions were polarized, based on varying levels of familiarity with similar dietary patterns, diverging taste preferences, and wide-ranging expectations of effects on PD-specific and general health outcomes. Capability and resources grouped together naturally under the "Perceived behavioral control" theme. Within this domain, competing personal responsibilities, attentional resources diverted to disease management tasks, PD-related apathy, and motor deficits compromising cooking skills, all proved especially problematic during the labor-intensive MeDi-KD phase. In the "Subjective norms" domain, household and cultural acceptance of study diets proved crucial for sustained adherence. Our study's registered dietitian played a pivotal role in supporting adherence through the direct provision of informational, instrumental, and social support, as well as by engaging care partners to bolster social support within the home. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis illuminates behavioral and contextual determinants of adherence to keto-adapted MeDis in PwPs, informing more sustainable dietary implementation strategies relevant both to future trial design and dietetics clinical practice.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05469997.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207