MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415714284 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.28.685240

DISTINCT NEURAL SIGNATURES OF HIPPOCAMPAL POPULATION DYNAMICS DURING LOCOMOTION-IN-PLACE

2025· preprint· W4415714284 on OpenAlexafffund
Samsoon Inayat, Brendan B. McAllister, Ian Q. Whishaw, Majid H. Mohajerani

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlzheimer SocietyUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsHippocampal formationStimulus (psychology)PopulationModulation (music)Sensory systemNerve netCalcium imagingNeural activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hippocampal CA1 neurons modulate their activity with movement variables such as time, distance, and speed, yet it remains unclear how these representations reorganize across behavioral states, from externally driven to self-paced movement and immobility. Here, we investigated how sensory events that initiate or terminate locomotion, structure CA1 population codes and how these codes reorganize across sensory-driven locomotion, spontaneous locomotion, and forced immobility. Using two-photon calcium imaging in head-fixed Thy1-GCaMP mice (n = 5) performing the air-induced running task on a non-motorized conveyor belt, we examined neuronal firing-rate modulation across a series of behavioral configurations designed to probe distinct forms of locomotion-in-place. In the No-Brake (locomotion-permitted) condition, the belt rotated freely, allowing animals to execute full cyclic limb movements in response to air stimulation. In the Brake (immobility) condition, the belt was fixed, restricting movement to partial or attempted locomotor motions. Firing-rate modulation with respect to time, distance, and speed was quantified using linear (Pearson correlation) and nonlinear (mutual information) metrics under permutation testing in the natural reference domains. Behaviorally, air stimuli produced faster, sustained running during air-on and more variable, self-paced movement during air-off. Neurally, a larger fraction of CA1 cells was active and significantly modulated during air-off. Within the modulated set, singularly tuned cells (time, distance, or speed) predominated over mixed-tuned cells, and speed-modulated cells peaked earlier after stimulus onset or offset than time- or distance-modulated cells. Under Brake, CA1 activity was predominantly singularly tuned to time or movement-in-place, with stronger movement modulation and engagement post-stimulation. Despite substantial single-cell turnover across configurations and phases, population-level analyses revealed a coherent, air-phase-locked organization and distinct movement-related populations across Brake and No-Brake conditions. These results indicate a state-dependent reweighting of sensorimotor features implemented atop a conserved ensemble scaffold in CA1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMemory and Neural Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→