MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415716317 · doi:10.1093/neuped/wuaf006

Growth hormone replacement therapy does not predict relapse across medulloblastoma subgroups

2025· article· en· W4415716317 on OpenAlex
Marina Caballero, Mari Wilhelmson, Jonathan D. Wasserman, Tara McKeown, Derek S. Tsang, Uri Tabori, Annie Huang, Anthony P. Y. Liu, Anirban Das, Julie Bennett, Ute Bartels, Éric Bouffet, Vijay Ramaswamy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaMultivariate analysisRetrospective cohort studyCohortSubgroup analysisRadiation therapyGrowth hormoneEndocrine system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Treatment for medulloblastoma can lead to significant long-term endocrine sequelae, including growth hormone (GH) deficiency. There has been some concern that GH replacement can increase the risk of tumor relapse. Our goal was to assess the risk of recurrence after GH therapy in medulloblastoma (MB) patients treated with ­modern, molecularly informed protocols. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 1999 to December 2022. Patients < 18 years old with MB who received craniospinal irradiation (CSI) were included, treated according to contemporary risk-adapted protocols. Epidemiological, molecular, and clinical data were collected. Results A total of 148 patients with MB were treated with CSI, with a median age of 8.3 years (IQR 5.9-10.8). The molecular subgroups included Group 4 (n = 69, 46.6%), Group 3 (n = 27, 18.2%), WNT (n = 21, 14.2%), and SHH (n = 20, 13.5%). During follow-up, 79 patients (53.4%) were diagnosed with GH deficiency, and 73 of them initiated GH therapy. We found no association between sex (P = 1), presence of metastases (P = .14), or molecular subgroup (P = .71) and the use of GH therapy. Thirty-four patients (22.9%) relapsed during follow-up, with 10 of them receiving GH therapy (13.7% of all patients on GH). Progression-free survival (PFS) was higher among those who received GH replacement therapy, even within each subgroup independently. In a multivariate analysis of patients who had not relapsed at least 2 years post-diagnosis, GH replacement was associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS) and a trend toward improved PFS (PFS: HR 0.35, 95% CI, 0.12-1.08, P = .068; OS: HR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.12-0.99, P = .049). Conclusions The use of GH is not associated with an increased risk of recurrence or death in children with medulloblastoma treated with CSI according to current protocols. Our results provide further reassurance that all children with requiring treatment for growth hormone deficiency after medulloblastoma therapy should be offered physiological growth hormone replacement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it