MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415718639 · doi:10.14740/jh2113

Emicizumab in Severe Hemophilia A: Clinical and Patient Determinants of Transition Within a Standardized Program

2025· article· en· W4415718639 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ingrid Blydt-Hansen, Michelle Bech, Shannon Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Transition (genetics)Clinical PracticePatient careMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Emicizumab (Hemlibra) became more accessible for Canadians in 2021, when Canadian Blood Services approved it under formulary for prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A (PWHA) without inhibitors. This offered an alternative to factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis. Starting in November 2021, a coordinated effort to offer and support the transition to emicizumab was initiated for all eligible adult PWHA living in British Columbia (BC) and Yukon Territory. Of the 69 PWHA who transitioned to emicizumab, it was observed that some were early adopters whereas others demonstrated more caution and transitioned later. Our aim was to better understand patient and clinical practice factors associated with the early and late transition to emicizumab. Methods: Retrospective data were assessed from clinical records, transition documents and available pre-transition patient-reported surveys for both patient and clinical factors. Results: Of the 83 patients with PWHA eligible for transition, 69 transitioned to emicizumab between November 2021 and December 2023. Median time to emicizumab transition was 10 months. Younger PWHA and those with fewer cumulative comorbidities tended to delay transition to emicizumab. Geographic distance from Vancouver was not significantly associated with transition timing. In multivariable analysis, younger age remained independently associated with longer time to transition (P = 0.0008), while having five or more joints affected by hemophilic arthropathy was associated with later transition (P = 0.007). Conclusions: Using a standardized transition program offered an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of patient and clinical factors associated with transition to a novel agent. This analysis highlights that certain clinical factors may influence uptake of new therapies within hemophilia care and the importance of early identification of barriers to facilitate treatment uptake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207