MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415723196 · doi:10.12779/dnd.2025.24.4.301

Effects of a 12-Week Hybrid Analog–Digital Cognitive Training on Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Pilot Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4415723196 on OpenAlexaff
S. S. Chung, Bori R. Kim, Sooin Moon, Geon Ha Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueDementia and Neurocognitive Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialCognitionCognitive trainingCognitive impairmentTraining (meteorology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: Global population aging heightens concern about cognitive decline, underscoring the need for scalable interventions. While computerized cognitive training offers benefits, many seniors face device-related challenges that limit adherence, and facility-based programs pose logistical barriers. To address these, we evaluated a 12-week home-based Hybrid Analog-Digital Cognitive Training (HCT) program, which paired a sensor-embedded, pressure-sensitive paper workbook with a Bluetooth-linked television, to enhance usability and engagement among cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. Methods: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 66 CU adults aged ≥60 years were allocated to HCT or control (each n=33) groups. Participants had literacy and Korean Mini-Mental State Examination scores above -1.5 standard deviation. The HCT group performed 30-minute sessions 5 times weekly for 12 weeks, while controls continued usual activities. Primary outcomes were changes in composite Z-scores for frontal, attention, and memory domains, derived from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery. Z-scores were direction-weighted and aggregated by domain. Between-group differences were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: =0.03), indicating improved executive function. No significant differences were found in attention or memory domains. Also, the HCT group exhibited improvements in psychological profiles. Conclusions: A home-based HCT program improved frontal executive function in CU older adults. The hybrid analog-digital design may help reduce digital barriers, support usability, and foster sustained participation. Larger trials with active controls, modality-specific comparators, and extended follow-up are warranted to confirm benefits and optimize delivery. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007922.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDementia and Neurocognitive DisordersSame topicTechnology Use by Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207