MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415726215 · doi:10.1186/s12871-025-03415-1

Predictive value of surgical pleth index for early postoperative pain in children undergoing general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

2025· article· en· W4415726215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lin Li, Qinghua Meng, Weizhi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Anesthesiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnesthesiologyObservational studyIntubationHeart ratePain scaleProspective cohort studyBlood pressurePostoperative painEndotracheal intubation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is common in children during early recovering from general anesthesia, especially for pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. There is no valid tool to predict postoperative pain at present. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients aged 4–8 years, scheduled to undergo adenotonsillectomy surgery were enrolled in the clinical trial. All patients were given intravenous general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation by the same pediatric anesthesiologist. Surgical pleth index (SPI) monitoring for each patient was performed from the same shared SpO2 measurement finger which was on the side opposite to the NIBP measurement through the CARESCAPE Monitor B650 (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland). The SPI values, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at each minute for five minutes immediately after surgery. The maximum values of SPI, MAP and HR (SPImax, MAPmax and HRmax respectively) were taken for analysis. Early postoperative pain was assessed for each patient using the modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) in postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the associated areas under the curves (AUC) were computed to analyze the ability of SPI to predict early postoperative pain. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients were included and analyzed finally. The SPImax, MAPmax and HRmax of the patients whose CHEOPS scores less than 4 were 43 ± 6, 58 ± 9mmHg and 90 ± 12 beat/min while of the patients whose CHEOPS scores equal or greater than 4 were 54 ± 8, 67 ± 11mmHg and 96 ± 13 beat/min respectively. The SPI (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.92, P < 0.001) had a good predictive value for postoperative moderate-to-severe pain compared with MAP (AUC: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.41–0.67, P = 0.58) and HR (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46–0.76, P = 0.19). The best-fit (highest combined sensitivity and specificity ) cut-off values of SPI to distinguish mild pain from moderate-to-severe pain was 46 with the sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 87.8%. CONCLUSIONS: SPI can effectively predict the occurrence of early postoperative moderate-to-severe pain in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery under general anesthesia. SPI might be one reliable pain assessment tool to guide pediatric anesthesiologists for timely identification and management of postoperative pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2200058658 (13/04/2022).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC AnesthesiologySame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207