MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415726461 · doi:10.14740/jmc5199

A Rare Cause of Umbilical Discharge in a Healthy Adult: A Case Report of Patent Urachal Sinus in Primary Care

2025· article· en· W4415726461 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Tukur Ibrahim, Zainal Adwin Zainal Abiddin, M. Khalid, Noorhida Baharudin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrachusContext (archaeology)Physical examinationUmbilicus (mollusc)Incision and drainageDifferential diagnosisPresentation (obstetrics)Abscess

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Umbilical discharge in adults is a rare presentation in primary care and is frequently misdiagnosed as superficial infections, umbilical dermatitis, or abscesses, particularly in individuals with known predisposing factors such as obesity, poor hygiene, or diabetes mellitus. However, in the absence of these risk factors, the possibility of underlying congenital anomalies such as a patent urachus should be considered, as prompt recognition and diagnosis are paramount to prevent complications such as recurrent infections, abscess formation, and even malignant transformation. We report the case of a 29-year-old healthy male who presented to a primary care clinic with a 5-day history of purulent umbilical discharge and abdominal pain without associated fever or systemic symptoms. Physical examination revealed mild periumbilical erythema and purulent discharge but no palpable mass. The absence of typical risk factors for superficial infection raised clinical suspicion of an underlying pathology. Early diagnostic workup with ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic collection within the subcutaneous tissues, and subsequent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confirmed an infected umbilical urachal sinus. The patient was promptly referred to a surgical team for inpatient management. He was commenced on intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and underwent an incision and drainage for the infected umbilical urachal sinus. He made an uneventful recovery and was arranged for an elective laparoscopic excision of the urachal remnant. This case highlights several important learning points. In adults, urachal anomalies are rare and frequently misdiagnosed as superficial infections or abscesses, especially in the context of comorbidities such as diabetes and obesity. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis, including rare congenital conditions such as a patent urachal sinus, when assessing adults presenting with umbilical discharge. It also illustrates the critical role of primary care providers in recognizing uncommon conditions, as timely recognition and diagnosis are essential for the effective management of this rare but potentially serious condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesFrench-language works237,207