MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415729363 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.30.685586

Epigenomic landscape of the developing human rhombic lip reveals gene regulatory network and non-coding loci of developmental, evolutionary, and disease relevance

2025· preprint· en· W4415729363 on OpenAlexafffund
Soumya V. Menon, Paul Wambo, Ilinca Lungu, Kimberly A. Aldinger, Shraddha Pai

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioCancer Research SocietyUniversity of Washington
KeywordsHindbrainEnhancerEpigenomicsGene regulatory networkChromatin immunoprecipitationRegulation of gene expressionTranscription factorChromatinH3K4me3

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cerebellar rhombic lip neural progenitor niche of the prenatal hindbrain is an anatomical structure critical for cerebellar glutamatergic neurogenesis. Humans have elaborated the rhombic lip niche to include a rhombic lip subventricular zone (RL-SVZ) not seen in mice or macaques. Although developmental disruptions of this progenitor zone can cause cerebellar growth abnormalities - from malformations to tumors - the gene regulatory networks underpinning this unique progenitor niche are unknown. Here we provide a predicted gene regulatory network for the human cerebellar rhombic lip, inferred from epigenomic maps of the developing human cerebellum. We generated DNA methylomes of neuroanatomically-dissected mid-gestation human rhombic lip ventricular zone and RL-SVZ (N=9 samples; 15-16 post conception weeks) using low-input Enzymatic MethylSeq. We also mapped histone modifications marking active promoters and enhancers in the whole mid-gestation human fetal cerebellum (N=6 samples; 14 and 18 post-conception weeks). Integrating these data, we identified 9,855 differentially-methylated regions (DMR) which converge on binding sites of over three hundred transcription factors, including master regulators of rhombic lip neurogenesis, ATOH1, NEUROD1, and NEUROD2. DMRs hypomethylated in the RL-SVZ are enriched in active enhancers and in human accelerated regions, and are depleted in active promoters. We inferred 81,844 transcription factor-enhancer-gene links, covering 41 transcription factors active in the rhombic lip, and 4,610 target genes that include drivers of cerebellar neurogenesis and pediatric hindbrain cancer. Twenty-five DMRs overlap human accelerated regions located near genes associated with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, and neurological deficits. DMRs are also statistically enriched in copy number aberrations in medulloblastoma, a malignant pediatric hindbrain cancer with subtypes hypothesized to originate in the rhombic lip. Close to one-quarter of the DMRs overlap known copy number aberrations in medulloblastoma, nominating potential enhancer and promoter elements impacted by these genomic aberrations. Collectively, our data provide a rich resource to start decoding the functional impact of non-coding variation on gene regulation in the developing cerebellum and on genomic dysregulation in diseases of cerebellar growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207