MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415732544 · doi:10.5539/mas.v19n2p126

Unmanned Surface Vehicle for Water Quality Monitoring

2025· article· W4415732544 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fauzal Naim Zohedi, Tan Shin Nee, Mohd Shahrieel Mohd Aras, Hairol Nizam Mohd Shah, Zainah Md. Zain

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
KeywordsUnmanned surface vehicleBuoyancyController (irrigation)Set (abstract data type)Sonar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposed an Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) for water quality monitoring purposes. The USV offered high maneuverability and accurate monitoring result with IOT implementation. The paper discussed the design and development of a USV, identifying the functionality of USV sensory system, and evaluating performance of USV based on stability, velocity, and acceleration. The USV is designed based on hemisphere shape and is equipped with two brushed DC motor propellers for maneuvering purposes. The buoyancy of USV is set at 89.1% positive buoyancy for stability purposes. Dabble Gamepad controller is implemented for USV to move remotely. Temperature, pH and turbidity sensors are embedded into the USV system for monitoring purposes. Internet of Things (IoT) system is coupled with the vehicle for data monitoring via internet as it offers versatility and efficiency. The developed USV shows outstanding results in terms of maneuverability and sensors functionality. The embedded sensors reading shows stable and accurate. This developed USV will have impact in maintaining the sustainability, and wellbeing of ecosystems and health of water resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207