MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415732978 · doi:10.15391/prrht.2025-10(5).03

Effectiveness of individualized occupational therapy interventions without the use of prosthetics for military servicemen with unilateral upper extremity amputations

2025· article· en· W4415732978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Postonogova, Олександра Калінкіна, Kostiantyn Kalinkin, Iryna Zharova, О. К. Ніканоров

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical rehabilitation and recreational health technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupational therapyPsychological interventionRehabilitationIntervention (counseling)Descriptive statisticsAmputationActivities of daily living

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose. This paper presents the results of an experimental study investigating the effectiveness of individualized occupational therapy interventions for people with upper limb amputations without the use of prosthetic devices. This study is relevant because the number of people in Ukraine who have had a limb amputated as a result of the ongoing war is increasing, as is the need for effective rehabilitation methods to improve quality of life. Material & Methods. The study employed a pre-test–post-test experimental design, allowing for the evaluation of changes in participants’ functional status and occupational performance following a structured occupational therapy intervention without prosthetic devices. Occupational therapy sessions were aimed at client education and teaching the clients new skills to use modified and compensatory strategies for task performance, adaptive equipment, as well as making adaptation of the environment for increased functional independence. Participants included 10 male military servicemen between the ages of 20 and 45 years old with upper extremity amputations who participated in occupational therapy interventions for two months. The assessment was carried out using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired samples t-test. Results. As a result of the occupational therapy interventions, the study participants demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in disability levels according to the DASH, as evidenced by an average score decrease from 80.5 prior to intervention to 44.2 post-intervention (p<.001). Similarly, the COPM assessment revealed clinically significant improvements (≥2-point change) in the performance of personal hygiene tasks, dressing, and cooking, as well as in satisfaction with performing personal hygiene, cooking, and driving tasks. The decrease in pain levels reported by the participants was also statistically significant with an average of 5,5 pre-test and 3,4 post-test on VAS (p<.001). Conclusions. The comparative analysis of disability levels, pain levels, as well as performance of meaningful occupations before and after interventions indicates a significant improvement in functional independence and life satisfaction of military servicemen with amputations following an individualized occupational therapy program. Results presented in the paper demonstrate a positive correlation between COPM and DASH. The study indicates that occupational therapy services aimed at teaching compensatory strategies of task performance, environmental education and patient education are beneficial for clients with upper extremity amputations even without the use of prosthetic devices. Additionally, the results of the study support the effectiveness of occupational therapy for military servicemen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical rehabilitation and recreational health technologiesSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207