Quadriceps‐Bone‐Block Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Tibial Interference Screw Aperture Fixation and Suture Tape Reinforcement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical procedures. The risk of clinical failure after isolated ACL reconstruction in high-risk populations is as high as 40% at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple strategies exist to decrease the risk of rerupture after ACL reconstruction, including manipulation of the graft source and diameter, optimization of the femoral and tibial tunnel position, addition of concomitant extra-articular procedures, and graft support with synthetic material. Independent graft reinforcement with a high-strength, nonabsorbable suture tape has become a popular, low-cost, low-morbidity technique to increase the graft yield strength, decrease graft stretching, improve clinical outcomes, and decrease rerupture rates. However, most suture tape reinforcement techniques require suspensory fixation of both the femoral and tibial sides, with no alternative for bone-block aperture fixation. Furthermore, the existing techniques for independent suture tape reinforcement with tibial aperture fixation are overly complex, requiring intra-articular shuttling of thick, multi-braided suture limbs. We present a simple, extra-articular shuttling technique for independent suture reinforcement of quadriceps-bone-block autograft ACL reconstruction with tibial interference screw aperture fixation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".