MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415736567 · doi:10.1364/josab.576672

Ultra-low-loss and broadband wavelength demultiplexer on LNOI for 780/1550  nm using SWG-assisted directional coupling

2025· article· en· W4415736567 on OpenAlexafffund
Leila Mehrvar, Saeed Oghbaey, Ahmad Atieh, Chang‐Qing Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsOptiwave Systems (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDemultiplexerLithium niobateBroadbandExtinction ratioPower dividers and directional couplersInsertion lossBandwidth (computing)WavelengthGratingWavelength-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wavelength division demultiplexer (WDD) is an indispensable component for separating and routing photons to spatially distinct detection nodes in practical quantum key distribution (QKD) systems. In this work, we propose an ultra-low-loss and broadband WDD based on lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI), designed and optimized through comprehensive three-dimensional simulations, utilizing subwavelength grating (SWG)-assisted double directional coupling for the separation of 780 and 1550 nm wavelengths. The SWG waveguide enables both a compact footprint and low insertion loss (IL) over a broad wavelength range, making it well suited for QKD applications. The optimized device, with a total length of 45 µm, achieves ILs of 0.04 dB at 780 nm and 0.22 dB at 1550 nm, along with extinction ratios of 22 and 32 dB, respectively. The 0.5 dB bandwidth exceeds 140 nm for 1550 nm and 230 nm for 780 nm. Furthermore, the structure exhibits strong tolerance to fabrication-induced variations, supporting its suitability for robust and scalable photonic integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear OpticsFrench-language works237,207