Effect of hemostatic agents on the outcome of pulpotomy in primary and permanent teeth: A systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: The success of pulpotomy depends significantly on the choice of materials and techniques used, including hemostatic agents. Despite extensive research, there remains a lack of consensus on the most effective hemostatic agent for pulpotomy. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the efficacy of hemostatic agents on the outcome of pulpotomy. Methods: studies was evaluated by JBI critical appraisal tool and New Castle Ottawa scale for cohort study and retrospective studies and qualitative synthesis was evaluated using National Services Scotland guidelines Meta analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the studies. Results: A total of eight studies were included in this review. Five studies concluded that sodium hypochlorite was more effective as a hemostatic agent in both primary teeth and permanent teeth. Two studies found potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser treatment produced superior clinical and radiographic outcomes in permanent teeth. Another study showed better results with cryotherapy in the permanent teeth. Conclusion: Sodium hypochlorite demonstrated superior hemostatic potential in primary teeth, whereas in permanent teeth, potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser and cryotherapy yielded promising results in clinical and radiographic outcomes with no statistically significant results when compared to sodium hypochlorite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".