MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415749627 · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf224

Coevolutionary cycling in allele frequencies and the evolution of virulence

2025· article· en· W4415749627 on OpenAlexafffund
Kim Ys, Ben Ashby

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoevolutionAlleleVirulenceExperimental evolutionAllele frequencyPopulation geneticsPopulationSelection (genetic algorithm)Human evolutionary genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coevolutionary cycling in allele frequencies due to negative frequency-dependent selection-sometimes referred to as Red Queen Dynamics-is a key potential outcome of host-parasite coevolution. While many theoretical studies have focused on understanding the consequences of coevolutionary cycling for the evolution of sex and recombination, little is known about the impact of coevolutionary cycling on the evolution of other life history traits. It is therefore currently unknown how coevolutionary cycling in allele frequencies affects the evolution of key disease characteristics, such as virulence. Here, we combine population genetic and quantitative genetic approaches to theoretically determine the impacts of coevolutionary cycling in allele frequencies on the evolution of virulence in a free-living parasite. By varying the level of genetic specificity required for infection while controlling for the average infection rate, we induce coevolutionary cycles and examine their effects on virulence evolution. We show that coevolutionary cycling does indeed have a strong impact on virulence evolution, with more specific infection genetics and higher allelic diversity generally driving larger and more rapid cycles in allele frequencies, leading to selection for higher virulence. Our research provides new fundamental insights into the relationship between coevolutionary cycling and the evolution of virulence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207