MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415754372 · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2025.10.001

Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Males with Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Analysis from an Integrated Database

2025· article· en· W4415754372 on OpenAlex
Farid Abdul Hadi, Arianne Schild, Merete Kock Hansen, Swapneel Anaokar, Sender Herschorn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersAstellas Pharma
KeywordsMirabegronOveractive bladderUrinary systemLower urinary tract symptomsUrinary bladderProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: Several phase 2-4 studies have investigated mirabegron for treating patients with overactive bladder (OAB). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in adult male OAB patients with or without benign prostate enlargement (BPE) receiving medications for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) management. Methods: A post hoc analysis of 13 phase 2-4 studies using mirabegron (2- or 4-wk single-blind placebo run-in followed by 12-wk double-blind treatment period) was conducted. The studies had four treatment arms-(1) mirabegron beginning with 25 mg and then escalated to 50 mg (25/50 mg), (2) mirabegron 50 mg, (3) mirabegron 25/50 mg + tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) 0.4 mg, and (4) mirabegron 50 mg + tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg, and three cohorts-cohort 1, OAB males overall; cohort 2, OAB males with concomitant BPE taking alpha blockers; and cohort 3, OAB males with concomitant BPE taking other LUTS medications (not alpha blockers). The primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to 12 wk in the mean daily number of micturitions and mean daily number of incontinence episodes. The secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and measures of OAB derived from the daily micturition diary, and patient-reported outcomes of voiding and storage. Key findings and limitations: These results showed improvement in the primary and most secondary endpoints. Participants taking alpha blockers and mirabegron had increased volume voided per micturition. Safety results were consistent with the known profile of mirabegron. Outcomes should be interpreted with caution, as there were few participants taking other LUTS medications. Conclusions and clinical implications: Results showed that mirabegron is effective and safe in male OAB patients, with or without BPE or receiving medications for LUTS management. Patient summary: We conducted a combined analysis of 13 studies of mirabegron in males with overactive bladder with or without benign prostate enlargement. The analyzed patients included those taking mirabegron and mirabegron combined with other medications for lower urinary tract symptoms. Our results showed that mirabegron was safe and effective in reducing the symptoms of overactive bladder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it