POST-LOAD PLASMA GLUCOSE INCREASE (PG-GAP) AS A RISK FACTOR FOR DEVELOPING DYSGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT Β-THALASSEMIA (Β-TDT): RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OVER 8 YEARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Background: Glucose dysregulation (GD) in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (β-TDT) patients demands early detection and intervention. However, current diagnostic criteria of patients with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may fail to detect all high-risk individuals. Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate the incremental rise gap in plasma glucose (PG) during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), defined as the difference between 2h-PG and fasting PG, as a predictor for the future risk of developing glucose dysregulation (GD) and overt diabetes in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (β-TDT) with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) . Research design and methods: 58 β-TDT patients, recruited from three Thalassemia centers (Iran, Italy and Greece), were selected for the study. β-TDT patients were categorized into three groups, based on the difference between 2 h-PG and FPG (2 h-PG – FPG): "Low post-load", when the gap (2-h PG mg/dL - FPG ) was < 20th percentile ( < 10 mg/dL) Group A; "Medium post-load and High post-load" groups, when the differences was distributed between 20th and <75th centile (> 10 mg/dL and < 30 mg/dL (Group B). and ≥75th percentile ( ≥ 30 mg/dL; Group C.). Results: In all 58 β-TDT patients, follow-up was available for 6-years and in 45 patients for 8 years within 2 years interval. The incidence of GD, [isolated high 1-h PG (>155 mg/dL) and Th-RD], after an 8-year follow-up, was significantly lower in Groups A and B (27/45 patients) compared to Group C (18/45 patients) (χ2: 4.8214;P:0.028). Noteworthy, three patients of group C ("High post-load gap") developed thalassemia-related diabetes mellitus (Th-RDM). At last evaluation in 13/45 (28.8%) patients the SF level was < 800 µg/L, in 17/45 (37.7%) between ≥ 800 µg/L and < 1,500 µg/L, in 14/45 (31,1 %) between ≥ 1,500 µg/L and < 3,000 µg/L, and in 1/45 (2.3%) ≥ 3,000 µg/L. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a high rise of postload plasma glucose gap, above 10 mg/dL, is associated with a progressively increased risk of glucose dysregulation over the next 6- 8-year period. These findings highlight the need for a personalized approach to assess the risk of early glucose metabolic disorders in β-TDT patients who are traditionally classified as normoglycemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".