MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415760884 · doi:10.34190/icer.2.1.3918

A Study of Preservice Teachers Developing Teaching Competencies with VEX GO Robotics

2025· article· W4415760884 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kamini Jaipal-Jamani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Education Research · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicTeaching and Learning Programming
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumWorksheetCoding (social sciences)RoboticsEducational roboticsTeacher educationIntervention (counseling)Competence (human resources)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is global impetus to include the learning of STEM skills across k-12 school curricula to keep abreast of changing occupational, economic and societal needs. The province of Ontario, Canada implemented a revised Grades 1-8: Science and Technology curriculum in 2022 that emphasises STEM learning across the elementary grades. However, majority of elementary teachers in Canada are generalists – they are expected to teach all subjects such as language, science, mathematics, and the arts. In this type of teacher education context, where majority of the elementary preservice teachers (PTs) do not have undergraduate degrees in the STEM disciplines, there is need to provide them with STEM experiences to develop their STEM knowledge and skills and their teaching competencies for elementary school STEM teaching. The literature shows that educational robotics (ER) can develop STEM skills in k-12 students. This paper reports on a study that examined how middle-school preservice teachers develop confidence and knowledge to teach about coding with VEX GO robotics. Data sources for n = 50 preservice teachers included a pre-questionnaire on prior knowledge, a pre- and post-questionnaire on confidence to teach with robotics, and a worksheet to guide activities and record coding solutions. Preservice teacher (PT) participants volunteered to participate and signed a consent form, approved by the university research ethics board. The quantitative data were analysed with SPSS version 29. The results were statistically significant for the effect of the robotics intervention on PTs’ confidence about their competencies to use robotics in teaching and learning of middle school science and a large effect size was observed. The findings also revealed that PTs’ participation in the robotics activity resulted in a gain in their reported knowledge about robotics to integrate in teaching and learning. The results inform the design of instructional experiences in Teacher Education courses to improve elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and competencies to teach with robotics in classrooms and also provide insights into the design of ER learning experiences for elementary school contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Education ResearchSame topicTeaching and Learning ProgrammingFrench-language works237,207