MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Digitalization of state financial control: ontological modeling as a tool for implementing a data-centric approach

2025· article· W4415762591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptualizationOntologyState (computer science)Control (management)Field (mathematics)Government (linguistics)Work (physics)Subject-matter expert

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The move towards data-centric architectures is a global trend for both commercial and government structures. Therefore, it is undoubtedly interesting to consider issues related to improving state financial control within the paradigm of data-centric public administration and to develop a conceptual approach to collecting and analyzing information about controlled entities, taking into account the possibilities for expanding the set of information sources and types of data on companies’ activities. To date, there has been virtually no research in the Russian scientific community on the conceptualization of the subject area of financial control, and the existing work is fragmentary. Therefore, the aim of this work is to justify the feasibility of applying an ontological model in the field of digitalization of state financial control functions, as well as to develop a prototype ontological model of state (municipal) financial control. Based on an analysis of the experience of Russia and foreign countries (China, the United States, Canada, South Korea, Argentina, Brazil, India, etc.) in the field of digitalization of state financial control functions, organizational, managerial and technological recommendations for building an effective system of risk-oriented state (municipal) financial control have been formulated. The recommendations have been systematized and ranked using the GRAGE approach and expert assessment methods. A survey showed that experts are focusing on the development of standardized approaches to the collection and processing of heterogeneous data, as well as the development of an ontological model. The main focus is on building an ontology for the subject area of state financial control. It is proposed to use a combination of top-level ontology (the BFO basic formal ontology standardized in the Russian Federation) with a subject ontology developed taking into account the specifics of state financial control in the Russian Federation. The ontological engineering methodology was based on a fractal approach, the Methontology framework, and the methodology of visual-analytical thinking. The ontology specification was completed, a prototype meta-ontology was obtained, including the basic concepts of state financial control, and prototypes of category ontologies and data sources used in expert and analytical activities by state structures were constructed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it