MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415769815 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.17.25331109

A comprehensive framework for the interpretation of <i>TTN</i> missense variants

2025· preprint· en· W4415769815 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Francesca Di Feo, Martin Rees, Victoria Lillback, Ay Lin Kho, Angelina Meybatova, Mark Holt, Heinz Jungbluth, Francesco Muntoni, Giovanni Baranello, Anna Sarkozy, Chiara Fiorillo, Serena Baratto, Claudio Bruno, Monica Traverso, Michele Iacomino, Marina Pedemonte, Noemi Brolatti, Francesca Faravelli, Federico Zara, Giuseppa Maria Luana Mandarà, Alan H. Beggs, Casie A. Genetti, Pamela Barraza‐Flores, Carmelo Rodolico, Sonia Messina, Franziska Schnabel, István Balogh, Katalin Szakszon, Siiri Sarv, Katrin Õunap, Federica Ricci, Alessandro Mussa, Edoardo Malfatti, Enrico Bertini, Adele D’Amico, Daria Diodato, Michela Catteruccia, Gianina Ravenscroft, Mridul Johari, С. В. Курбатов, Polina Chausova, Aysylu Murtazina, Anna Kuchina, Olga Shchagina, Minas Drakos, Martha Spilioti, Athanasios Evangeliou, Ioannis Zaganas, Huahua Zhong, Sushan Luo, Luciano Merlini, Crystal Nguyen, Giorgio Tasca, Tara Reeves, Stellan Mörner, Olof Danielsson, Bjarne Udd, Mathias Gautel, Marco Savarese

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeEuropean CommissionSuomen KulttuurirahastoKing's College LondonSamfundet FolkhälsanBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMissense mutationIn silicoMinor allele frequencyExonExomeMutationPhenotypeGenetic testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Missense variants in TTN pose a major challenge in genetic diagnostics due to their high frequency in the general population, the large size of the gene, and the complex multidomain architecture of the titin protein. While the contribution of truncating variants (TTNtv) to titinopathies is well established, the role of rare TTN missense variants remains poorly defined. Advances in computational prediction and functional testing offer new tools to assess their potential pathogenicity, which however are currently not fully utilized for clinical application. Methods We analyzed an international cohort of unsolved myopathy cases selected based on the presence of a rare missense variant in trans with a TTNtv. Clinical data were collected from neuromuscular centers worldwide. In silico predictions were generated using AlphaMissense and complemented by MAF and exon usage information. Additional inclusion criteria were based on a Minor Allele Frequency < 0.010 and an AlphaMissense score ≥ 0.792 for the missense variant, in accordance with the latest ClinGen guidelines. Selected missense variants were characterized in vitro through protein expression and cell imaging assays to assess their effects on domain solubility and aggregation. Results Thirty patients with TTNtv/missense combinations were identified, presenting with heterogeneous myopathic phenotypes, ranging from congenital to adult onset. An in-depth analysis on AlphaMissense predictions highlighted those changes most frequently predicted as possibly pathogenic. Functional assays showed that three selected variants with changes to proline, located in β-sheets of Ig domains, led to impaired folding, cytoplasmic aggregation and co-localisation with proteostasis markers. In our cohort, all non-proline mutations occurred at buried sites, while some proline substitutions affected exposed residues. Notably, the variant p.(Gln7023Pro) was identified in 5 unrelated families sharing a conserved haplotype, indicating a common ancestor. This variant and the previously reported p.(Arg25480Pro) variant have been reclassified as likely pathogenic. Conclusions By integrating clinical, computational, and functional evidence, we propose a framework for interpreting TTN missense variants. Combining multiple lines of evidence is essential for variants’ classification and interpretation, especially given TTN complexity. Advancing diagnostic accuracy will require tailored interpretation guidelines and a global effort in data sharing and functional validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207