Effect of Aerobic Combined Resistance Exercise in Dialysis on Restless Legs Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the effects of aerobic combined resistance exercise in dialysis on restless legs syndrome (RLS), sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and quality of life of maintenance dialysis patients. METHODS: 59 patients who underwent maintenance hemodialysis combined with RLS in the blood purification center of Taihe County People's Hospital of Anhui Province from September to December 2024 were selected as the study subjects. The study subjects were divided into 30 cases of the control group and 29 cases of the intervention group using a randomized numerical table. The control group received routine dialysis and health education. In contrast, the intervention group received aerobic combined resistance exercise in dialysis, similar to the control group, with the time controlled at about 40 min, three times a week for 12 weeks. We observed the severity of RLS (IRLS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and quality of life (the Kidney Disease Questionnaire, KDQ) in the two groups before and after 12 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in IRLS, PSQI, SAS, SDS, and KDQ scores between the two groups before the intervention (p > 0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, IRLS, SAS, and SDS scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, the intervention group showed significantly improved PSQI scores (p < 0.05). The KDQ scores were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Aerobic combined resistance exercise in dialysis can improve the symptoms of RLS in maintenance hemodialysis patients, enhance sleep quality, reduce negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, and improve quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".