MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415782052 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.5c01828

Waveguide-Coupled Mid-Infrared GeSn Membrane Photodetectors on Silicon-on-Insulator

2025· article· en· W4415782052 on OpenAlexafffund
Cédric Lemieux‐Leduc, Mahmoud R. M. Atalla, Simone Assali, Nicolas Rotaru, Julien Brodeur, Stéphane Kéna‐Cohen, Oussama Moutanabbir, Yves-Alain Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersArmy Research OfficeAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCanada Research ChairsInnovation for Defence Excellence and Security
KeywordsResponsivityFabricationPhotonicsPhotodetectorSilicon photonicsSiliconSemiconductorWaveguideDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After thriving in telecommunications over recent decades, silicon photonics is now being extended into the mid-infrared range, where it has the potential to unlock a wide range of valuable opportunities in sensing, imaging, and free-space communications. In view of this perspective, the germanium-tin (GeSn) alloy has been extensively investigated as a silicon-compatible semiconductor with bandgap tunability that covers this entire spectral range. Indeed, a variety of GeSn-based high-performance optoelectronic devices have been demonstrated, confirming the potential of this system for mid-infrared applications. However, the integration of these devices onto silicon photonic platforms remains underexplored. Herein, we demonstrate the fabrication and integration, through transfer-printing, of strain-relaxed GeSn membranes onto silicon-on-insulator waveguides to create integrated detectors operating at wavelengths up to 3.1 μm at room temperature. Two different designs of waveguide structures are evaluated to study the coupling efficiency between the passive structures and the active membrane detector. A responsivity reaching 0.36 A/W at an operating wavelength of 2.33 μm is measured under a bias of 1 V. Moreover, the fabrication resulted in multiple working devices exhibiting similar performance using a single transfer printing step, demonstrating the scalability of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207