MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415784134 · doi:10.37432/jieph-confpro5-00235

Establishment and implementation of the West African biorisk management network: A progress report of the West African Health Organization

2025· article· W4415784134 on OpenAlexaffabout
Olivier Manigart, Chinelo Ebruke, Nancy Adjami, D Sangaré, Abiodun Denloye, Maureen Ellis, Issiaka Sombié, Abdourahmane Sow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsInternational Political Science Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationGeneral partnershipBiosecurityBiosafetyStakeholderStakeholder engagementWorkforceStrategic planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction In response to persistent gaps in Biorisk Management (BRM) implementation in West Africa, a unified effort among biosafety and biosecurity (B&B) stakeholders led to the creation of the WABNet. Coordinated by WAHO, WABNet brings together representatives from all 15 ECOWAS Member States, alongside partners such as GFA, Global Affairs Canada, IFBA, Africa CDC, WHO AFRO, ASLM, Fondation Mérieux, and others. Its mission is to build and sustain regional capacities for the safe and secure handling of high-consequence pathogens. Methods WABNet’s establishment was guided by a series of stakeholder consultations, resulting in the formation of a Technical Working Group and the development of a five-year strategic plan. Regional workshops, involving representatives from all ECOWAS countries and partner institutions, were held to define strategic objectives and strengthen BRM. Training sessions and IFBA certification workshops in BRM and Biological Waste Management (BWM) were conducted in partnership with Africa CDC, aiming to develop a skilled and certified B&B workforce across the region. Results Formally launched in 2021 during an online workshop, WABNet’s five-year strategic plan and governance manual were technically validated in 2023. Since then, 70 professionals from both human and veterinary sectors across 15 countries have been trained and certified in BRM — including in eight countries that previously had no trained personnel. In BWM, the number of IFBA-certified professionals has increased from 2 to 36 across 11 countries. Furthermore, in addition to the five existing biosafety associations in the region, two new associations have recently been established. Conclusion The growing cadre of certified professionals is now positioned to cascade training and reinforce biosafety practices at national and subnational levels, supporting laboratories in aligning with international standards. The establishment and expansion of national B&B associations will also enhance advocacy, intersectoral collaboration, and policy engagement with relevant ministries across the ECOWAS region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public HealthSame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207