MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract Sun602: Lower Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Older Females: The Joint Effect of Age and Sex

2025· article· en· W4415789065 on OpenAlexaff
Emad Awad, Brian Grunau, Jim Christenson, Karin H. Humphries, Jennie Helmer

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsIsland HealthCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitationOdds ratioReturn of spontaneous circulationOddsRetrospective cohort studySurvival rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sex-based differences in survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been widely studied, but the joint effect of age and sex remains unclear. Aims: To examine the joint effect of age and sex on OHCA outcomes, hypothesizing that older females have lower rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the British Columbia (BC) site of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Cardiac Arrest registry (2011–2016). EMS-treated adult OHCA patients were included; traumatic arrests and DNR cases were excluded. Patients were stratified into four age-sex groups: younger females (18–47 years), younger males (18–47), older females (≥53), and older males (≥53). To reduce misclassification bias, we excluded 833 patients aged 48–52. Multivariable logistic regression assessed differences in ROSC and survival between groups, using younger females as the reference and adjusting for Utstein predictors. Results: A total of 6,454 cases were included in the analysis. Older females had the lowest rates of public location arrests (7.1%) and shockable rhythms (12.4%). Crude ROSC rate was lowest in older females (33.9%) compared to other groups: older males (35.4%), younger males (38.7%), and younger females (38.9%) (p = 0.33). Crude survival to hospital discharge differed significantly across groups, with older females having the lowest survival rate (6.1%) (p < 0.001) (Table 1). After adjusting for Utstein predictors, the odds of ROSC were significantly lower in younger males (OR 0.76, p = 0.01), older females (OR 0.75, p = 0.006), and older males (OR 0.63, p < 0.001), compared to younger females (reference group). For survival to hospital discharge, older females had the lowest odds (OR 0.30, p < 0.001), followed by older males (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). The odds of survival in younger males did not differ significantly from younger females (OR 1.02, p = 0.87) (Table 2). Conclusion: Older females exhibited the lowest rates of ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Adjusted analysis confirmed significantly lower odds of both outcomes in this group. The lower prevalence of shockable rhythms among older females may partially explain these disparities; however, further investigation is warranted to identify additional factors contributing to these disparities in outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→