MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4364377: An Integrative Strategy Combining Genetic, Proteomic, and Clinical Data Identifies Circulating WARS as a Candidate Target for Hypertension.

2025· article· en· W4415791610 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Chignon, Guillaume Lettre

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationBiobankGenome-wide association studyPleiotropyQuantitative trait locusGenetic associationProteomeExpression quantitative trait lociDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypertension (HTN) is a major cardiovascular risk factor and a leading cause of premature death, affecting ~30% of the global population. Despite available treatments, ~20% of individuals live with drug-resistant HTN. Blood pressure (BP) regulation involves the endothelium in contact with circulating plasma proteins, which are easily pharmacologically accessible. Notably, drug targets with genetic support are 2.6 times more likely to succeed clinically. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a multi-omic strategy would identify genetically supported circulating proteins as promising therapeutic targets for HTN. Methods: We combined two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) with Bayesian genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in an analysis integrating BP GWAS data from ~1 million individuals and plasma protein quantitative trait loci data for 4,717 proteins from 35,559 individuals. This approach identified a causal plasma proteome (CPP) influencing BP through specific loci. Using the tag variants from these loci, we calculated a polygenic score (PS) to perform a PS-based phenome-wide association study (PS-PheWAS) to assess the association of the CPP with HTN and its pleiotropy across 795 phenotypes measured in ~500,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKBB). We used MR to distinguish causal from pleiotropic associations. Finally, we used clinical features and plasma protein expression data from ~50,000 UKBB participants to prioritize causal proteins significantly associated with incident HTN and related diseases using Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Results: From the 4,717 plasma proteins tested, we identified a CPP of 7 proteins associated with BP through 12 variants. The PS-PheWAS showed that the two strongest associations were for essential HTN ( p = 3.78×10 -36 ) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; p = 6.23×10 -9 ). MR supported causal effects of the expression of 5 of the 7 proteins for CKD and lifespan (CLMP, NCAN, PLXNB2, TCEA2, and WARS). Prospective analyses showed that plasma levels of one of them, WARS, were significantly and positively associated with the incidence of HTN, CKD, and mortality, independently of BMI ( Figure 1 ). Conclusion: Our strategy prioritized WARS as a genetically supported causal plasma protein positively associated with HTN, CKD, and mortality, highlighting its potential as a new therapeutic target for HTN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→