Comparison of the bone marrow composition in samples from rib, ilium, sternum, and humerus of dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bone marrow (BM) samples in dogs are typically acquired from hematopoietically active trabecular BM at appendicular skeletal sites, such as the proximal humerus and femur, or axial skeletal sites, such as pelvis, sternum, and rib. Suitability for in vivo biopsy varies by site, but equivalency of BM composition at different sites is uncertain. We sought to determine whether the composition of BM is comparable in humerus, ilium, rib, and sternum. Samples from each site were obtained within 24 h after death from 30 dogs with spontaneous disease submitted for postmortem examination. Tissues were fixed in acetic acid–zinc–formalin, demineralized with EDTA, and assessed by 4 independent raters for hematopoietic cellularity, granulocytic:erythrocytic (G:E) cell ratio, megakaryocyte (MKC) number, and presence of hemosiderin. Statistical analysis showed lower cellularity, MKC number, and hemosiderin in ilium than in rib, higher cellularity in rib and sternum than in humerus and ilium, and lower G:E cell ratio in rib than in humerus ( p < 0.05). Analysis of covariance indicated that most differences between sites were attributable to individual animal variation rather than site or rater. Differences overall were of small magnitude, and values for each parameter were similar to those reported in healthy younger dogs. We concluded that samples from any of the 4 sites are suitable to approximate composition of BM at the other sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".