MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4365838: Survodutide for the Treatment of Obesity: Baseline characteristics of the SYNCHRONIZE Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial

2025· article· en· W4415794669 on OpenAlexaff
Elke Platz, Lee M. Kaplan, Carel W. le Roux, Sean Wharton, Samina Ajaz Hussain, Martina Brueckmann, Elena Startseva, Constanze Fey, Mikhail Kosiborod, Biykem Bozkurt

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboMyocardial infarctionClinical endpointHeart failureBody mass indexStroke (engine)DyslipidemiaDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dual agonism of glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors is effective in reducing body weight and fat mass, but its cardiovascular (CV) effects are unknown. Aims: The primary objective of the SYNCHRONIZE-CV outcomes trial (CVOT) is to test non-inferiority of survodutide compared with placebo for time-to-first occurrence of any of the adjudicated components of the primary composite endpoint of 5-point major adverse CV events, defined as CV death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-related coronary revascularization, or heart failure events. Methods: We describe the baseline characteristics of participants in the SYNCHRONIZE-CVOT, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven, CV safety study of survodutide, a dual glucagon and GLP-1 receptor agonist, compared with placebo in adults with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m 2 and established CV or chronic kidney disease (CKD), and/or at least 2 obesity-related complications or risk factors for CV disease (CVD). Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly subcutaneous injections of survodutide (up-titrated to 3.6 or 6.0 mg) or placebo, in addition to standard lifestyle-based care. Results: Overall, 5,508 participants were randomized to and treated with survodutide or placebo across 524 sites in 34 countries (mean age 61 years, 40% women, mean body mass index 37 kg/m 2 , mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 77 mL/min/1.73m 2 ; Table ). At baseline, common CV risk factors included hypertension (88%), dyslipidemia (82%) and type 2 diabetes (53%). Established CVD included coronary artery disease (53%), prior myocardial infarction (35%), prior stroke (16%) and heart failure (11%); and 17% of participants had CKD. SYNCHRONIZE-CVOT enrolled a pre-specified subgroup of individuals with prevalent heart failure. Among these 601 participants with heart failure (NYHA II-III at screening), median NT-proBNP was 424 pg/ml and mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score was 71. At baseline, more than half of participants with heart failure were treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and 66% with loop diuretics. Conclusions: SYNCHRONIZE-CVOT enrolled people who were overweight or obese across a broad spectrum of CVD and CKD risk categories. SYNCHRONIZE-CVOT is the first randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that will determine the CV safety of survodutide in people with overweight/obesity and increased CV risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→