MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4370368: AI-Predicted Osteoporosis from Preprocedural CT Scans Predicts Mortality After TAVR: A Multicenter Study

2025· article· en· W4415794685 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saleena Gul Arif, Amna Iram, Enzo D Amico Gandia, Ding Yi Zhang, Jonathan Afilalo

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisSarcopeniaProportional hazards modelBone densityBone mineralCohort studyCohortQuantitative computed tomographyGold standard (test)Multicenter study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Osteoporosis and sarcopenia are common but underrecognized contributors to frailty in older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Standard risk scores omit musculoskeletal parameters despite their known association with adverse outcomes. Objective: To evaluate whether osteoporosis predicted by an AI-based model using routine pre-TAVR CT scans is associated with long-term mortality in a large, multicenter TAVR cohort. Methods: We developed a radiomics-based machine learning model trained on 252 patients with paired CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from Jewish General Hospital and McGill University Health Centre (Canada). The model estimated lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and T-scores and was applied to preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT scans routinely acquired for TAVR planning in 906 patients across five institutions in the US, Canada, and Ireland. Osteoporosis was defined as AI-predicted T-score ≤ –2.5. Skeletal muscle density was extracted from the same CTs. Associations with all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox regression. Results: The radiomics-based regression model demonstrated strong agreement with DXA-derived BMD, achieving a mean absolute error of 0.06, R 2 of 0.87, and correlation coefficient of 0.93. The corresponding classification model predicting WHO T-score categories (normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis) achieved an overall accuracy of 0.82. Applied to the external TAVR cohort (n=906), the model identified 3.0% (27/906) of patients as osteoporotic (T-score ≤ –2.5). AI-defined osteoporosis was significantly associated with increased long-term mortality (HR 2.27; 95% CI: 1.23–4.19; p=0.009). Higher skeletal muscle density was also associated with reduced mortality (HR per 1 HU increase: 0.987; p=0.041). Patients classified as osteoporotic had lower muscle volume and higher frailty scores. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis further demonstrated that osteoporotic patients had significantly lower long-term survival. Although only 3% of the cohort had osteoporosis, survival curves diverged early and remained separated, suggesting this subgroup represents a clinically vulnerable population. Conclusion: An automated AI-based model accurately estimates BMD from routine pre-TAVR imaging and identifies patients at increased mortality risk. Opportunistic CT-based assessment of bone and muscle health may enhance frailty screening and risk stratification in older adults undergoing TAVR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207