MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415809314 · doi:10.3390/ph18111662

Overlap and Divergence in Ketamine and Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder: A Scoping Review

2025· review· en· W4415809314 on OpenAlexafffund
Jay Toulany, Jasmyn E. A. Cunningham, Abraham Nunes

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmaceuticals · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNova Scotia Health Research FoundationQEII Foundation
KeywordsKetamineLithium (medication)Bipolar disorderAntidepressantMoodMood stabilizerMood disorders

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Lithium remains the first choice for long-term prophylaxis of mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD), but only 30% of patients will respond, and there is no reliable method by which to predict treatment response. Ketamine is a rapid antidepressant therapy which ostensibly yields greater results in patients with clinical phenotypes that are classically associated with lithium non-response. This inspired a scoping review to map the overlapping and divergent clinical and mechanistic evidence for acute ketamine response and long-term prophylactic lithium therapy in BD. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of clinical and preclinical studies that examine convergent and divergent predictors and mechanisms of acute response to ketamine and long-term response to lithium. Results: Data from 19 preclinical studies show mechanistic convergence of ketamine and lithium on the GSK-3β/mTOR pathways, and enhancement of synaptic plasticity. Furthermore, lithium appears to consistently limit ketamine-related oxidative stress and hyperlocomotion. However, data from the 23 clinical studies suggest divergence of predictors of response to ketamine and lithium in BD, with ketamine response associated with metabolic risk factors, anxiety/mixed features, and non-melancholic presentations, which are generally predictors of poorer prophylactic lithium response. No study directly tested ketamine response as a predictor of prophylactic lithium response. An important limitation is that clinical studies of ketamine are enriched for lithium-refractory populations and have often included mixed unipolar and bipolar cases. Conclusions: Overall, existing data support mechanistic overlap but clinical divergence between ketamine and lithium responders, though this is confounded by sampling bias. We must therefore undertake longitudinal studies of prophylactic lithium therapy among patients with BD who received ketamine for acute antidepressant treatment in order to investigate if responsiveness to ketamine predicts response to lithium, and establish control over BD earlier in the course of illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmaceuticalsSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207