Functions of TIP60/NuA4 Complex Subunits in Cell Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The TIP60/NuA4 complex is a large, multifunctional histone acetyltransferase assembly of ~1.7 megadaltons, composed of 17-20 subunits, which plays a central role in epigenetic regulation. Through recognition of H3K4me3 by the ING3 reader, TIP60/NuA4 is recruited to sites of active transcription, where it remodels chromatin to regulate gene expression. Its activities include histone acetylation, histone variant exchange, transcriptional co-activation, and regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. In this review, we examine how altered subunit levels or mutations impact the chromatin structure and transcriptional activity, and how these changes influence differentiation across diverse cell types. We emphasize the molecular mechanisms by which TIP60/NuA4 shapes lineage specification, including histone H2A and H4 acetylation by the KAT5 catalytic subunit, H2A.Z incorporation by EP400, and interactions with transcription factors such as MyoD, PPARγ, and Myc. By integrating mechanistic and functional insights, we highlight how TIP60/NuA4 acts as a central epigenetic hub in differentiation and contributes to proper developmental transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".