Contemporary hazard and health discourse in urban renewal: a critical examination of smart, sustainable, earthquake and pandemic-proof imaginaries driving dispossession in Tirana, Albania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amidst a global surge in urban development foregrounding smart, sustainable, and now pandemic-proof design, new forms of longstanding hazard and health discourse are being deployed to justify dispossession, particularly in self-built districts. Looking at a case in Tirana, Albania, we examine how this discourse is being contemporized and paired with diverse digital media as it overlaps within a single project – the Tirana Riverside Project. As expressions of authoritative knowledge, architectural visualizations, social media posts, state-backed news broadcasts, and international design blogs work to validate this underlying ideology driving demolition. Such imagery and discourse, we contend, thus need to be read as artifacts of power that entrench government authority while substantiating mass dispossession. We argue that these processes are not only about the real estate profits demolition-based urban renewal generates but also – in Albania’s flawed democratic context – their ability to support the ruling elite. Using content analysis, we identify four hazard and health imaginaries overlapping within the project: 1) pandemic-proof design; 2) design for seismic emergencies; 3) zero-emission sustainable design; and 4) smart city technologies. We show how these imaginaries join longer traditions of normative discourse around hazard and health in urban renewal yet scrutinize their distinct contemporized and localized expressions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".