An Automated Workflow for Generating 3D Solids from Indoor Point Clouds in a Cadastral Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate volumetric modeling of indoor spaces is essential for emerging 3D cadastral systems, yet existing workflows often rely on manual intervention or produce surface-only models, limiting precision and scalability. This study proposes and validates an integrated, largely automated workflow (named VERTICAL) that converts classified indoor point clouds into topologically consistent 3D solids served as materials for land surveyor’s cadastral analysis. The approach sequentially combines RANSAC-based plane detection, polygonal mesh reconstruction, mesh optimization stage that merges coplanar faces, repairs non-manifold edges, and regularizes boundaries and planar faces prior to CAD-based solid generation, ensuring closed and geometrically valid solids. These modules are linked through a modular prototype (called P2M) with a web-based interface and parameterized batch processing. The workflow was tested on two condominium datasets representing a range of spatial complexities, from simple orthogonal rooms to irregular interiors with multiple ceiling levels, sloped roofs, and internal columns. Qualitative evaluation ensured visual plausibility, while quantitative assessment against survey-grade reference models measured geometric fidelity. Across eight representative rooms, models meeting qualitative criteria achieved accuracies exceeding 97% for key metrics including surface area, volume, and ceiling geometry, with a height RMSE around 0.01 m. Compared with existing automated modeling solutions, the proposed workflow has the ability of dealing with complex geometries and has comparable accuracy results. These results demonstrate the workflow’s capability to produce topologically consistent solids with high geometric accuracy, supporting both boundary delineation and volume calculation. The modular, interoperable design enables integration with CAD environments, offering a practical pathway toward an automated and reliable core of 3D modeling for cadastre applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".