Adjoint-Driven Inverse Design of a Quad-Spectral Metasurface Router for RGB-NIR Sensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been an increasing demand for high-resolution image sensing technologies in recent years due to their diverse and advanced optical applications. With recent advances in nanofabrication technologies, this can be achieved through the realization of high-density pixels. However, the development of high-density and miniaturized pixels introduces challenges to the conventional color filters, which generally transmit and absorb different spectral components of light. A significant portion of the incident light is inherently lost using conventional color filters. Moreover, as the pixel size is shrunk, optical losses appear to be substantial. To address these fundamental limitations, a novel nanophotonic optical router is proposed in this work. Our router utilizes a single-layer, all-dielectric metasurface as a spectral router. The metasurface is designed through an inverse design approach that exploits adjoint sensitivity analysis. A novel figure of merit is developed and incorporated in the inverse design process, enabling the metasurface design to effectively sort and route the incoming light into four targeted channels, each corresponding to a distinct spectral component-red, green, blue, and near-infrared. We demonstrate that the proposed quad-spectral metasurface router, having a compact footprint of 2 μm×2 μm, achieves an average optical efficiency of approximately 39% across the broad spectral range, i.e., 400-850 nm, with each spectral channel exceeding an efficiency of 25%. This surpasses the maximum efficiency attainable by the conventional four-channel color filters. Our proposed quad-spectral metasurface router offers a wide range of applications in low-light imaging, image fusion, computational photography, and computer vision. In addition, this work highlights the applicability of an adjoint-based inverse design approach to accelerate the development of compact, efficient, and high-performance nanophotonic devices for the next generation of imaging and sensing systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".